Independent & educational platform Not a government body. No link or affiliation with any government organisation. Made for learning only. Test only systems you own or are authorised to test. Become a Partner or Sponsor → Full disclaimer

CVE-2026-48858

medium

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ftp (ftp_internal module) allows FTP bounce attacks and SSRF via an unvalidated PASV response IP…

Vendor / product: Erlang — erlang\/inets

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ftp (ftp_internal module) allows FTP bounce attacks and SSRF via an unvalidated PASV response IP address. The ftp_internal:handle_ctrl_result/2 PASV handler (mode=passive, ipfamily=inet, ftp_extension=false) extracts the IP address from the server's 227 response and passes it directly to gen_tcp:connect/4 without validating it against the control connection peer address. The adjacent EPSV handlers correctly call peername(CSock) to derive the IP from the control connection, but the PASV handler does not. A malicious or compromised FTP server can redirect the client's data connection to an arbitrary internal host and port. On read operations (ftp:ls/1,2, ftp:nlist/1,2, ftp:recv/2,3), data from the redirected target is returned to the caller. On write operations (ftp:send/2,3, ftp:append/2,3), file content is sent to the redirected target. This enables SSRF against internal hosts, cloud metadata endpoints, and FTP bounce attacks against third-party hosts. The vulnerable path is the default configuration (mode=passive, ipfamily=inet, ftp_extension=false). RFC 2577 section 3 explicitly recommends validating the PASV response IP against the control connection peer. The ftp application is deprecated and scheduled for removal in OTP-30. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/inets/src/ftp/ftp_internal.erl (inets 5.10.4 through 6.5, OTP 17.4 through 20.3) and lib/ftp/src/ftp_internal.erl (ftp 1.0 and later, OTP 21.0 and later). This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.4 before OTP 27.3.4.13, OTP 28.5.0.2, and OTP 29.0.2, corresponding to inets from 5.10.4 before 7.0, and ftp from 1.0 before 1.2.3.1, 1.2.4.1, and 1.2.6.

CVSS
6.5
6.5 (CVSS v3.1)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Severity source: NVD CVSS v3.1 (nvd@nist.gov)
Timeline (UTC)
Published: 2026-06-10 16:17
Modified: 2026-11-11 19:17
NVD status: Modified
Last synced 50 minutes ago
Verified against the source API 2026-11-11 19:42 UTC
Exploitation
Not listed in CISA KEV (as of last catalog sync)
Absence from KEV does not mean a CVE is not exploited. Exploitation status: unknown (no authoritative evidence in our sources).

Affected products

erlang / erlang\/inets ≥5.10.4 <7.0
erlang / erlang\/otp ≥17.4 <27.3.4.13, ≥28.0 <28.5.0.2, ≥29.0 <29.0.2
erlang / ftp ≥1.0 <1.2.3.1, ≥1.2.4 <1.2.4.1, ≥1.2.5 <1.2.6

Weakness classification (CWE)

Source: NVD / CISA. “NVD-CWE-Other” and “NVD-CWE-noinfo” mean NVD could not assign a specific weakness.

Mitigation & advisories

Vendor advisory: https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-24cv-hwgr-37fq
Patch / mitigation: https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48858.html
Patch / mitigation: https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/2691a806231ffd0490a8a9e20500dec0c7e73727
Patch / mitigation: https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/521bcfa24407ee8cb5614823cf905c37ea3aa605
Patch / mitigation: https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-24cv-hwgr-37fq
Patch / mitigation: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48858

References

Data sources

NVD CVE API 2.0 — fetched 2026-11-11 19:42 UTC · record ↗

Learn the basics

Understanding CVEs and CVSS Scores

Related CVEs